Тема форума: «Хасай Алиев и метод "ключ"»

<<вам по существу есть что сказать?>>

Kак раз по существу, Я писала доктороу Алиеву через его сайт и он передал мне в Калифорнию текст с исселедованиями. Извините, что он на английском, но уверена, что вы разберетесь.
Это маленькая часть из большой группы исследований, а больше он передаст вам на форум тогда, когда увидит, что вы действительно ищите истину, а не занимаетесь самоутверждением. Ниже - приложена маленькая часть из исследований эффективности метода "Ключ" .

Дополнительную информацию можно найти на его официальном сайте: http://www.stress.su/

==============================================================

Assessment of the Key Method’s Effectiveness

Three surveys were carried out to assess the method’s effectiveness:
1. Survey of the effect on the coefficients of fatigue, performance efficiency, and physical endurance (those surveyed included microassembly operators, athletes, a group of volunteers—a total of 440 people).
2. Survey of the method’s efficiency during anti-stress training of people engaged in dangerous professions (a total of 656 people).
3. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Key techniques during emergency rehabilitation of terrorist act victims (2,500 people).
Total number of people surveyed—3,596.
A set of psychological and psychophysiological methods was used to assess the effectiveness of the method, including:
- structured interviews;
- self-report inventories of those surveyed on their wellbeing;
- visual monitoring of the dynamics of the physical condition of terrorist act victims;
- monitoring of the dynamics of arterial blood pressure and heart rate.
In order to make monitoring of the changes and data obtained objective, each person’s mental wellbeing was assessed at the beginning and at the end of entire session.
The surveys were carried out both in laboratory conditions and in real conditions of anti-stress training of people engaged in dangerous professions and rendering medical and psychological assistance to victims of terrorist acts.
1. Influence of the Key Method on the Coefficients of Fatigue, Performance Efficiency, and Physical Endurance of the People Surveyed—Volunteers, Microassembly Operators, and Athletes.
The activity of microassembly operators at the Sirius Electronic Enterprise was analyzed to assess the influence of the Key Method on the fatigue and performance efficiency coefficients. An analysis was also carried out of the influence of this method on the psychological climate of the work environment.
The method was introduced in several stages:
- Assessment of the workers’ initial receptivity to learning psychophysiological self-control skills using the Key Method.
- Efforts to raise the initial level of receptivity to learning psychophysiological self-control skills.
- Development of psychophysiological self-control skills in the people surveyed.
The following was established as a result of introducing anti-stress training for operators at the Sirius Enterprise:
1. There was a significant improvement in functional wellbeing in the trained group of microscope operators (the level of initial nervous psychic tension and fatigue was lower, stability of arterial blood pressure was higher, there were fewer complaints of headaches, depressed moods, and sleep disruptions).
2. There was on average a 2.5-3-fold increase in the length of continuous tense routine optical activity in operators in conditions of modulated subcritical and critical loads against the background of a decrease in the fatigue coefficients and an increase in the stability of psychological and psychophysiological coefficients (before learning the psychophysical self-control skills, signs of fatigue and loss of performance efficiency appeared in 8-13 minutes, whereas after training, the operators could engage in continuous optical activity for up to 40-45 minutes).
3. There was on average a 2.5-3-fold decrease in the length of the rehabilitation process in operators in conditions of modulated subcritical and critical loads.
4. Group training of self-control skills was accompanied by an increase in interpersonal contacts and an improvement in the psychological climate of the work environment.
5. Individual labor productivity in the trained operators increased by an average of 20-25%.
The survey conducted shows that use of the Key Method raised performance efficiency in the microscope operators due to reduced fatigue, adequate mobilization, and optimal energy distribution, which, it appears, is ensured by the psychological tuning the worker carries out in a state of self-control.

2. Influence of the Key Method on Physical Performance Efficiency
In order to assess the method’s influence on physical performance efficiency, people were surveyed who did not have any special physical training in the Harvard Step Test (20 people—7 women and13 men between the ages of 18 and 30).
The Fitness Coefficient score was on average 8.7 points higher in the test group than in the control group. In terms of the changes in the Fitness Coefficient, the subjects (people taking the test) were divided into three groups: first group (6 people)—slight increase in performance efficiency (increase in Fitness Coefficient score < 5 points); second group (6 people)—greater increase in performance efficiency (increase in Fitness Coefficient score < 10 points); third group (8 people)—significant increase in performance efficiency (increase in Fitness Coefficient score < 10 points) (see, Figure 1).

Figure 1
Dynamics of the Harvard Step Test Fitness Coefficient



* p < 0.05
Some of the calculation coefficients which show the state of the adaptation mechanisms and the level of vegetative maintenance of activity have reliable positive dynamics:
1. The integral coefficient of the current functional condition of the cardiovascular system (ICCS) that characterizes the functional condition of the cardiovascular system as a whole and the level of its regulation, which was high in the tests before the course, decreased on average by 12% after the course.
2. The physical condition coefficient (PCC), which characterizes readiness for physical exertion, increased on average by 53%.
3. Similar positive dynamics were also noted for the vegetative Kerdo coefficient—the transfer from predominantly sympathetic to parasympathetic tone.
4. The blood-circulation system tension adaptation coefficient (AC) as an indicator of the adaptive capabilities of the entire body decreased on average by 9%.
5. The cardiovascular regulation coefficient (CVRC), which characterizes self-regulation of the cardiovascular system and sufficiency of the functional reserves of the blood-circulation system, revealed a tendency to transfer from cardiovascular self-regulation in the tests before the course to vascular self-regulation after the course.
All the coefficients are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2
Dynamics of the Integral Coefficients of Functional Wellbeing Before and After the Course




After using the Key Method, along with the objective coefficients of increased physical performance efficiency, all the subjects noted less fatigue and greater ease of physical movements, without the usual tension, in their reports. We also observed that use of the Key Method was conducive to more organized and rhythmical movements in the subjects.

3. Efficiency of the Key Method on Highly Qualified Operators and Athletes
The surveys were organized according to the same system and included an analysis of the subjects’ physical condition at rest, after 30 minutes of continued intense activity, and during restitution before and the day after the Key Method was learned.
The mental performance efficiency of the operators was analyzed while performing intense modulated operator work in comfortable microclimatic conditions. This analysis was based on the subjects’ optic-motor reaction to a photic stimulus produced at an interval of between 0 and 5 seconds. A total of 40 tests were carried out on 20 volunteers.
In this series, mental and physical performance efficiency was measured at the same time using a mixed intellectual and physical functional test, whereby with a dosed physical load of around 150 watts the subject performed modulated operator work on complicated sensorimotor reactions of color distinction between a choice of three colors carried out at an automatic rate. The testing was conducted at the Medical Restorative Center of the Olympic Training Sports Complex in the town of Podolsk.
The results of the analysis of modulated operator performance efficiency in terms of the time of a simple optical reaction at the first stage show the optimized influence of the Key Method on the performance efficiency and functional state of the central nervous system of the test subjects (see, Figure 3).
Figure 3
Dynamics of a Change in the Coefficients of Operator and Physical Performance Efficiency Using a Modulated Intellectual and Physical Test Before and After the Course


(Comment: * - p < 0.05)
OPE – operator performance efficiency, MRV – minute respiration volume, RR – respiration rate, HR – heart rate

The results of the analysis of modulated operator performance efficiency and physical performance efficiency also show the basically optimizing influence of the Key Method.
1. Use of the method resulted in a reliable increase in the speed of the correct complex reactions of color differentiation to approximately 7 reactions a minute (an increase of approximately 10%). Modulated intellectual and physical sampling after the course showed that the operator performance efficiency had increased on average by 10%.
2. A reliable decrease in the minute respiration volume of 4.5 liters was achieved when performing intense physical work, and of 4 liters (4%) during the restitution period. At rest, no reliable differences in this coefficient (MRV) were found.
3. A reliable decrease of 4-17% was also found in RR and HR when performing physical work using the method.
There were no differences in these coefficients at rest.
All the results are presented in Figure 3.
4. Most of the subjects noted an improvement in their physical performance efficiency, less distraction, and no fatigue upon completion of the work. These data are confirmed by the data obtained using the WAM method; reliable and positive shifts were noted in all three coefficients (wellbeing, activity, mood). The observed changes in the hemodynamics and regulatory mechanism coefficients were accompanied by a reliable increase of 24% in the integral evaluation of WAM (Figure 4).

Figure 4
Dynamics of WAM Test Coefficients Before and After the Course



So the dynamics of the change in cardiovascular coefficients, integral coefficients of functional wellbeing, and operator and physical performance efficiency before and after the course show that the Key Method makes it possible to lower the level of tension and optimize psychophysiological wellbeing and vegetative homeostasis.
The tests carried out of the method for optimizing intense operator and physical activity and functional wellbeing with the participation of test volunteers and the use of contemporary psychophysiological methods made it possible to draw the following conclusions:
1. The Key Method has an optimizing effect on modulated operator and physical performance efficiency and functional wellbeing. A reliable improvement in functional wellbeing after use of the Key Method is revealed with the help of objective psychophysiological coefficients and based on the test subjects’ self-evaluation.
2. The Key Method can be recommended for optimizing operator and physical performance efficiency and functional wellbeing.
3. It is worth taking a look at how training in the Key Method is conducive to learning health-improvement techniques that raise self-control skills and the benefit derived from physical exercises, reflexology, and massage.
4. It is also worth studying the actual mental state and personal characteristics of people with high receptivity to the method and the problems of automating training of this method.

2. Efficiency of the Key Anti-Stress Training in Persons Engaged in Dangerous Professions
An analysis of the efficiency of the anti-stress training techniques was carried out during combat service (56 servicemen from the crew of an aircraft carrier participated in the test—36 people in the experiment group and 20 people in the control group).
The anti-stress training course consisted of 3 to 9 sessions during the first week of service. Sessions were held every day. Assessment of the wellbeing of the test subjects was carried out before and after each session and extensive testing was done at the beginning and end of the entire training course.
The following results were obtained:
1. Experiment group (36 people).
According to the Spielberg test (Trait Anxiety Inventory), the following was revealed: the level of situational anxiety by the end of the course reliably (p < 0.001) decreased from 42.86 to 32.93; improvement in the normative coefficient according to the scale (N = 36) amounted to 55%. The level of situational anxiety reliably dropped throughout the course. A stable reaction of anxiety symptoms was observed from session to session.
According to the A and D test (anxiety and depression), the following was revealed: the average coefficients for the Anxiety and Depression scales before the course were higher than the normal values, whereas after the course they were within the normal boundaries (see, Figure 5).

(SEE NEXT POST) >>

>> CONTINUED (PART 2):

Figure 5
Dynamics of the Situational Anxiety and Stress Coefficients in Servicemen on the Admiral Kuznetsov Heavy Aircraft-Carrying Cruiser

before course
after course
Situational Anxiety Stress
According to the wellbeing/activity/mood test, the level of coefficients for the wellbeing (which expresses the functional wellbeing of the body in integrative form), activity (expresses the actual energy potential), and mood (expreses the emotional attitude to internal and external conditions of vital activity) scales reliably (p < 0.01 for all three scales) increased by the end of each session and after the course was over. Improvement in terms of the scales was 18% for wellbeing; 18% for activity; and 20% for mood (see, Figure 6).

Figure 6
Dynamics of the Coefficients for the Wellbeing/Activity/Mood Test Before and After the Course



Dynamics of the Heart Rate, Arterial Blood Pressure, and Energy Expenditure Coefficients
After the course, positive dynamics of the psychological coefficients are also confirmed by the dynamics of the coefficients of the blood-circulation system: heart rate decreased by 11%, arterial diastolic blood pressure by 7%, arterial systolic and average blood pressure by 8%, and energy expenditure of the left ventricle by 14% (see, Figure 7).



Figure 7
Dynamics of the Heart Rate, Arterial Blood Pressure, and Energy Expenditure Coefficients Before and After the Course

(HR – heart rate; ADP – arterial diastolic pressure; ASP – arterial systolic pressure; MAP – mean arterial pressure; EE – energy expenditure)
(Note: * - p < 0.05)
1. The minute blood circulation volume and
2. stroke volume decreased (see, Figure 8).



Figure 8
Dynamics of Cardiac Output (Q), Stroke Volume (SV), and Total Peripheral Resistance (TPV) Before and After the Course



Q - cardiac output; SV – stroke volume; TPR – total peripheral resistance
Self-Report Data
After the sessions, most of the test subjects described themselves as being much calmer, having more self-confidence, being less irritated, feeling more composed, and enjoying a noticeable improvement in sleep.
With respect to the dynamics of wellbeing that emerge after taking the anti-stress training course, the following was revealed:
* normalization of mood;
* absence of marked emotional reactions to situations that used to cause anxiety, a feeling of protection, a feeling that a protective wall separated the person from the traumatic situation;
* decrease in anxiety;
* increase in activity and performance efficiency;
* normalization of sleep (ability to fall asleep easily, uninterrupted deep sleep, feeling of satisfaction with the quality and length of sleep upon waking in the morning).
At the same time, the functional wellbeing of the people in the control group was largely characterized by unfavorable dynamics that entailed lower activity coefficients and self-assessment of wellbeing, an increase in situational anxiety, and a tendency toward greater sympatotonic influences on the hemodynamics.
A conclusion can be drawn on the basis of the above results. The analysis carried out showed the high efficiency of the anti-stress training method among aircraft carrier crew members who are prone to developing disadaptive behavior and consequently must be seen by the squadron psychologist. Use of the Key Method made it possible to reduce the unfavorable effects of extensive sea trips on the mental and psychophysiological wellbeing of the servicemen and avoid the development of disadaptive behavior.
The self-reports of psychologists who took the anti-stress training course and have returned from combat zones note positive effects, such as resistance to stress, decreased fatigue, and increased professional functional capabilities when working with personnel.
The Key Method can be used in psychoprophylactic practice and during psychological rehabilitation.

3. Assessment of the Efficiency of Using the Key Techniques for Emergency Rehabilitation of Terrorist Act Victims
Emergency rehabilitation using the Key techniques was performed on terrorist act victims in the towns of Kizlyar (1995 – 240 people), Kaspiisk (1996 – 420 people; 2002 – 1,200 people), Essentuki (2003 – 180 people), and Beslan (2004 – 430 people).
Since there was a limited amount of time for carrying out rehabilitation of the victims, the efficiency of using the Key’s ideomotor techniques was assessed by means of visual monitoring of the dynamics of the victims’ wellbeing, as well as by measuring the level of arterial blood pressure and heart rate, conducting structured interviews, and having the victims make self-report inventories.
The analysis carried out showed the high effectiveness of the anti-stress training method for servicemen and people working in dangerous professions, as well as for express rehabilitation of the victims of terrorist acts in the Northern Caucasus.
After the course, the following positive changes were observed in the terrorist act victims:
- fewer angina attacks in 55%;
- less pain, which made it possible for 25% of the patients to decrease the amount of medication they had to take 1.5-2-fold;
- 98% of the patients felt an improvement in their overall wellbeing, quality of nocturnal sleep, and emotional state, while headaches, dizziness, cardiac pain, and cardiac palpitations disappeared;
- in 55% of the cases, positive ECG dynamics were seen, and there was a drop in arterial blood pressure from 210/120 to 150/90;
- positive ophthalmoscopic changes were noted in 96% of the patients suffering from vision fatigue syndrome.
The obtained results prove once again that the anti-stress training method’s guided ideomotor techniques are very effective in express rehabilitation of victims, particularly when time is limited and the victims are in a state of severe shock, making traditional verbal psychotherapy techniques ineffective.
When time is at a premium and there is no equipment for recording the dynamics of the patient’s physical condition, the following indicators can be used to gage the effectiveness of the guided ideomotor techniques in emergency conditions:
1. The number of Key ideomotor responses performed.
2. The rate at which the ideomotor responses are performed.
3. The degree to which blinking and swallowing reflexes, as well as facial muscle tension decreases.
4. The emergence of spontaneous automatic swaying of the body while performing the Key techniques.
The unique value of the Key techniques is that they automatically reduce the initially high level of nervous tension that is particularly characteristic in cases of acute stress. Since, and this is worth repeating, verbal methods of psychological correction and psychotherapy have little effect in this altered state of consciousness, use of the Key Method first removes the stress, which then paves the way to effective rehabilitation of the victims.
After the victims began using the techniques, most of them were released from their state of nervous overtension within 1-20 minutes. Their state of distress was replaced by a state of relaxation accompanied by feelings of peace and a clear head. In every case, this ensured a positive turning point in the victim’s wellbeing and made it possible to continue rehabilitation using verbal forms of psychological correction and psychotherapy.

Conclusions
1. The Key Method based on guided ideomotor techniques makes it possible to raise the level of stress resistance, develop skills of psychophysiological self-control, reduce the training time, ensure the possibility of developing skills in conditions close to reality, lower the level of stress in extreme situations, and speed up restoration of psychophysiological wellbeing.
2. It has been established that use of the Key Method makes it possible to reduce the intensity of stress reactions and reliably improve hemodynamic and angiotonic parameters of blood circulation.
3. Use of the Key Method makes it possible to significantly improve the coefficients of physical and operative performance efficiency (the Harvard Step Test by 10%, sensorimotor reaction by 10%, and the integral wellbeing/activity/mood coefficient by 24%).
4. The Key Method is much faster than traditional methods for producing the desired results and does not require any special facilities or conditions for doing the exercises. Restoration of psychophysiological wellbeing is achieved 1.5-3-fold faster.
5. The Key Method is the method of choice for people who have demanding jobs, athletes, people engaged in dangerous professions, and victims in need of rapid rehabilitation, as well as for training a large number of people at once in stress management skills in conditions where verbal contact is problematic.

автор: alexfox сообщение 25238

Кстати, вы мимоходом не поясните это http://scorcher.ru/autorization/clone.php?user_ip=aenzs7EwKamoqCAgoGEiw==&user_name=Katia&user_id=3253 с участвующей в обсуждении Andrea у вас что общего?)

Вы меня поразили, поставив этот вопрос. Двадцать лет живя в Америке и участвуя во множестве различных форумов, никогда подобного не видела. Такое впечатление, что этот форум создан не для обсуждений, а для проверок или для втаптывания людей в грязь, как обcуждаемых, так и обсуждающих.

Не удивительно, что люди осмелившиеся выразить мнения не соответсвующие мнению большинства, чувствуют здесь себя оплёванными "общими усилиями" и не видят смысла продолжать дискуссию. Помимо игнорирования многочисленных вопросов, доводов и фактов (и обвиняя в этом других), одно то, что вы решили поставить этот вопрос, указаывает на использование запрещённого приёма в риторике -- "Argumentum ad hominem " (Аргументум ад хоминем) -- а здесь за подобное вроде (как однажды выразился один из участников), "банят нафиг".

Научитесь использовать свои же правила сайта, подтянитесь до уровня цивилизованного общения, относитесь ко всем нарушениям с одинаковой строгостью (извините повторяю слова своей "соучастницы", или может даже свои собственные)), чтобы с Вами возможно было вести дискуссию, а не что-то смахивающее на дешёвую перебранку по правилам -- кто скажет последнее слово или оригинальнее сострит, тот и выиграет.

автор: alexfox сообщение №25242

"В соответствии с духом пункта №2 так же не приветствуется создание своих клонов,"

А Вы никогда не предполагали, что люди могут пользоваться одной интернетной связью с разных компьютеров, а иногда даже одним и тем же компьютером? что нередко бывает как в учебных учреждениях так и в резиденциях?
Или такое только у нас в Калифорнии?
И вообще, что это доказывает или меняет в сути сказанного <<мною/мною/мною>>?

Заходить сюда одно удовольствие; чувство, что здесь занимаются расследованием каких то личных аттрибутов. Может это принято у Вас, но здесь в США это называется violation of privacy (нарушение прайвеси) -- и считается не только дикостью, но и наказуемо законом/подвергается судимости. Уже не говоря о моральных ущербах выставления своих предположений публично.

Такими темпами, ещё неизвестно, до какой моей личной информации Вы можете докопаться. Не удивлюсь если завтра выставите мой адрес на всеобщее обозрение.

Но как я поняла, Др. Алиев всё таки и представляет из себя что то, раз он так сильно раздражает. А иначе подвергся бы атаке не он, а какой-нибудь там не менее интенстивно рекламирующий себя человек.

Наверное самое милое дело это всё таки согласится от имени всех нас троих и сказать: Да, он на самом деле занимается брехнёй. И все "дурачки" в сферах военной обороны, ничего не понимающего Минздрава, а также космонавтики, были им искусно одурачены.

Напоследок по избитой теме РКИ: насколько мне извесно они имеются, но если они докажут достоверность метода, то что-то подсказывает мне, что они тоже могут стать предметом критики.

Так что пусть их выставляют мои другие ники, если считают стОящим. А я на этом форуме уже поняла всё что мне надо было понять.

<<Олег/Катиа/Андреа>> (как нас здесь уже кличут)

А почему такие мякгие меры? Рубите прямо всех, чтоб трехглавый змий больше сюда не захаживал. И сообщения можно все в мусор, и нет больше проблем!

И снова восстановится стабильность и спокойствие, то что как-то так метко описал очередной мой дважды заклёванный "соучастник" Адлан, сказав:

автор: сообщение 25075

мне просто не с чем тут спорить: я целиком полностью поддерживаю позицию уважаемых зачинщиков форума и безоговорочно признаю их непререкаемую правоту во всех означенных вопросах и непогрешимость в пространстве этого форума. И призываю всех участников последовать моему примеру. Потому что каждый имеет право и возможность создать виртуальное пространство, в котором он будет и Истиной, и Законом. Для тех, кому влом париться, предлагаю шаблон: создаете форум с единственным правилом: "ЗДЕСЬ круче всех я!", затем создаете единственный пост (Слово, которое в начале), примерно такого содержания: "Приветствую на этом форуме всех меня поддерживающих. Всех оппонентов отсылаю к Суровым но Справедливым Правилам Форума!". И можно погрузиться в божественную нирвану.

И будут царством править "свои", где препирательства и нарушения правил приемлемы лишь для тех кто соблюдает одно негласное правило! А вы знаете какое?